多市场协同下的可再生能源电力竞价策略研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0184

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 248-255.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0184

• 论文 • 上一篇

多市场协同下的可再生能源电力竞价策略研究

周德群¹, ², 周显扬¹, ², 丁浩¹, ²

1. 南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院，江苏南京211106；2. 南京航空航天大学能源软科学研究中心，江苏南京211106

收稿日期:2022-01-26 修回日期:2022-03-23 发布日期:2023-02-09
通讯作者: 丁浩(1991-)，男(汉族)，江苏盐城人，南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院，讲师，博士，研究方向：可再生能源发展管理，Email:dding2009@nuaa.edu.cn. E-mail:dding2009@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71834003)；国家社会科学基金资助重大项目(21&ZD110)

Research on Renewable Electricity Bidding Strategy under Multi-market Coordination

ZHOU De-qun¹, ², ZHOU Xian-yang¹, ², DING Hao¹, ²

1. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China;2. Research Center for Soft Energy Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China

Received:2022-01-26 Revised:2022-03-23 Published:2023-02-09
Contact: 丁浩 E-mail:dding2009@nuaa.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了实现电力行业低碳转型，我国正逐步建立和完善全国碳配额与交易市场和绿色电力证书市场。如何设计和协调市场政策目标以推动可再生能源电力平价上网是我国电力系统绿色低碳化转型的关键。本文构建了多市场协同下的电力企业竞价模型，研究碳市场、绿证市场与电力市场的价格形成和市场之间的价格传导路径，分析多市场协同作用下电力企业竞价策略的差异。研究结果表明：多市场协同对减少碳排放和促进可再生能源发展有显著效果，收紧碳配额供应和提高绿证配额的市场协同机制能够为可再生能源发电企业创造新的利润增长点，增加传统能源发电成本，缩小可再生能源电力和传统能源电力的价格差异。本文揭示了多个市场之间内在的协同机理，有助于政策制定者充分考虑到市场间的协同关系，从而制定更加高效的减排和可再生能源发展政策。

关键词: 碳交易市场；绿色证书；市场协同；可再生能源；电力竞价

Abstract: In order to achieve low-carbon transformation of power sector, China has gradually established and improved the national carbon emission trade market and tradable green electricity certification market. How to design and coordinate the targets of these market policies to promote renewable energy power parity is the key to the green and low-cost transition in China’s power system. A bidding model of electric power enterprises under multi-market coordination is constructed, and the price formation and price transmission path among the carbon market, the green certificate market and the electricity market are simulated. The differences in bidding strategies of power companies under the synergy of multiple markets are analyzed. Combined with the results of calculation examples, it is found that multi-market coordination has a significant effect on the dual goals of reducing carbon emissions and promoting the development of renewable energy. The tightening of carbon quota supply and the increase of green certificate quotas both help reduce the price difference between renewable energy power and traditional energy power. Market coordination can create new profit growth points for renewable energy power generation companies and increasing the production cost of coal-fired power generation. The inherent coordination mechanism of multiple markets is revealed. It helps policy makers to fully consider the synergy between markets, so as to formulate more efficient emission reduction and renewable energy development policies.

Key words: carbon emissions trading; tradable green certificates; market coordination; renewable energy; bidding price

中图分类号:

C934
TK6

周德群, 周显扬, 丁浩. 多市场协同下的可再生能源电力竞价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 248-255.

ZHOU De-qun, , ZHOU Xian-yang, , DING Hao,. Research on Renewable Electricity Bidding Strategy under Multi-market Coordination[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 248-255.

参考文献

［1］ Zhou Dequn, Ding Hao, Wang Qunwei, et al. Literature review on renewable energy development and China’s roadmap［J］. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2021, 8(2): 212-222.
［2］ Feng Tiantian, Li Rong, Zhang Huimin, et al. Induction mechanism and optimization of tradable green certificates and carbon emission trading acting on electricity market in China［J］. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 169: 105487.
［3］黄守军, 杨俊. 异质发电商竞争下电力市场减排锦标博弈——结构与行为［J］. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(12): 52-71.Huang Shoujun, Yang jun. Mitigation tournament game under heterogeneous generators competition in electricity market: structure and behavior［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(12): 52-71.
［4］ Jiang Minxing, Yang Dongxiao, Chen Ziyue, et al. Market power in auction and efficiency in emission permits allocation［J］. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 183(3): 576-584.
［5］ Zhang Kun, Yao Yunfei, Liang Qiaomei, et al. How should China prioritize the deregulation of electricity prices in the context of carbon pricing? A computable general equilibrium analysis［J］. Energy Economics, 2021, 96(c): 105187.
［6］ Wong J B, Zhang Qin. Impact of carbon tax on electricity prices and behaviour［J］. Finance Research Letters, 2022, 44(c): 102098.
［7］廖诺, 赵亚莉, 贺勇, 等. 碳交易政策对电煤供应链利润及碳排放量影响的仿真分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 154-163.Liao Nuo, Zhao Yali, He Yong, et al. Effects of carbon trading polices on profit and carbon emission of electric-coal supply chain based on simulation analysis［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(8): 154-163.
［8］ Liu Xiaoou. Research on bidding strategy of virtual power plant considering carbon-electricity integrated market mechanism［J］. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022, 137: 107891.
［9］张新华, 黄天铭, 甘冬梅, 等. 考虑碳价下限的燃煤发电碳减排投资及其政策分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 167-174.Zhang Xinhua, Huang Tianming, Gan Dongmei, et al. Carbon emission reduction investment for coal-fired power plants and policy analysis considering carbon price floor［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(11): 167-174.
［10］ Song Yazhi, Liu Tiansen, Liang Dapeng, et al. A Fuzzy Stochastic Model for Carbon Price Prediction Under the Effect of Demand-related Policy in China’s Carbon Market［J］. Ecological Economics, 2019, 157: 253-265.
［11］ Dormady N C. Carbon auctions, energy markets & market power: an experimental analysis［J］. Energy Economics, 2014, 44(c): 468-482.
［12］ Tang Ling, Wu Jiaqian, Yu Lean, et al. Carbon allowance auction design of China’s emissions trading scheme: a multi-agent-based approach［J］. Energy Policy, 2017, 102(c): 30-40.
［13］ Darmani A, Rickne A, Hidalgo A, et al. When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: a review of the tradable green certificate assessments［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 62(c): 372-381.
［14］ Heimvik A, Amundsen E S. Prices vs. percentages: use of tradable green certificates as an instrument of greenhouse gas mitigation［J］. Energy Economics, 2021, 99(1): 105316.
［15］ Schusser S, Jarait J. Explaining the interplay of three markets: green certificates, carbon emissions and electricity［J］. Energy Economics, 2018, 71: 1-13.
［16］ Tu Qiang, Mo Jianlei, Betz R, et al. Achieving grid parity of solar PV power in China- The role of Tradable Green Certificate［J］. Energy Policy, 2020, 144: 111681.
［17］赵新刚, 任领志, 万冠. 可再生能源配额制、发电厂商的策略行为与演化［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 168-179.Zhao Xingang, Ren Lingzhi, Wan Guan. Renewable portfolio standard, the strategic behavior of power producers and evolution［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 168-179.
［18］ Yi Bowen, Xu Jinhua, Fan Ying. Coordination of policy goals between renewable portfolio standards and carbon caps: a quantitative assessment in China［J］. Applied Energy, 2019, 237(c): 25-35.
［19］ del Río P. Why does the combination of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme and a renewable energy target makes economic sense?［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 74(c): 824-834.
［20］ Dai Hancheng, Xie Yang, Liu Jingyu, et al. Aligning renewable energy targets with carbon emissions trading to achieve China’s INDCs: a general equilibrium assessment［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 4121-4131.
［21］ Wang Ge, Zhang Qi, Su Bin, et al. Coordination of tradable carbon emission permits market and renewable electricity certificates market in China［J］. Energy Economics, 2021, 93(c): 105038.
［22］周德群, 丁浩, 周鹏, 等. 基于过程划分的可再生能源技术扩散模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 217-225.Zhou Dequn, Ding Hao, Zhou Peng, et al. Renewable energy technology diffusion model based on process division［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(2): 217-225.
［23］ Song Yazhi, Liu Tiansen, Ye Bin, et al. Linking carbon market and electricity market for promoting the grid parity of photovoltaic electricity in China［J］. Energy, 2020, 211(c): 118924.
［24］ Fischer C, Preonas L, Newell R G. Environmental and technology policy options in the electricity sector: are we deploying too many?［J］. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2017, 4(4): 959-984.
［25］ Duan Maosheng, Tian Zhiyu, Zhao Yongqiang, et al. Interactions and coordination between carbon emissions trading and other direct carbon mitigation policies in China［J］. Energy Research & Social Science, 2017, 33: 59-69.
［26］ Richstein J C, Chappin  J L, de Vries L J. Adjusting the CO2 cap to subsidised RES generation: can CO2 prices be decoupled from renewable policy?［J］. Applied Energy, 2015, 156: 693-702.
［27］ Zhang Mingming, Tang Yamei, Liu Liyun, et al. Optimal investment portfolio strategies for power enterprises under multi-policy scenarios of renewable energy［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 154: 111879.
［28］ Baisa B, Burkett J. Large multi-unit auctions with a large bidder［J］. Journal of Economic Theory, 2018, 174(c): 1-15.
［29］ Chen Huadong, Wang Can, Cai Wenjia, et al. Simulating the impact of investment preference on low-carbon transition in power sector［J］. Applied Energy, 2018, 217(c): 440-455.
［30］ Wang Qunwei, Cheng Cheng, Zhou Dequn. Multi-round auctions in an emissions trading system considering firm bidding strategies and government regulations［J］. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, 25(7): 1403-1421.

多市场协同下的可再生能源电力竞价策略研究

Research on Renewable Electricity Bidding Strategy under Multi-market Coordination

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0