中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 155-166.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0165
王一雷1, 夏西强2, 张言3
收稿日期:
2021-01-23
修回日期:
2021-03-23
出版日期:
2022-04-20
发布日期:
2022-04-26
通讯作者:
夏西强(1984-),男(汉族),河南周口人,郑州大学商学院,教授,博士,研究方向:绿色供应链、再制造管理、博弈论,Email:xqxia@zzu.edu.cn.
E-mail:xqxia@zzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
WANG Yi-lei1, XIA Xi-qiang2, ZHANG Yan3
Received:
2021-01-23
Revised:
2021-03-23
Online:
2022-04-20
Published:
2022-04-26
Contact:
夏西强
E-mail:xqxia@zzu.edu.cn
摘要: 为分析不同类型的碳交易政策对供应链中企业运营产生的长期影响,在考虑产品商誉能够影响消费者需求且具有动态变化过程的基础上,构建了供应链中制造商和零售商的三种微分博弈模型。研究结果表明:与没有碳交易相比,基于企业碳排放历史数据的碳交易政策的实施能够从长期角度提升制造商产品的碳减排水平和零售商的低碳宣传水平,同时产品最终的商誉和零售商的利润也有所增长;此外,基于产品碳排放数据的碳交易政策的实施能够进一步提升产品的碳减排水平、商誉和零售商利润,而零售商的低碳宣传水平保持不变;当政府的政策满足特定条件时,基于产品碳排放数据的碳交易政策对制造商更有利。
中图分类号:
王一雷,夏西强,张言. 碳交易政策下供应链碳减排与低碳宣传的微分对策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 155-166.
WANG Yi-lei, XIA Xi-qiang, ZHANG Yan. Differential Strategies of Carbon Emission Reduction and Low-carbon Promotion of the Supply Chain under Cap-and-trade Policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(4): 155-166.
[1] 李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正. 基于产品替代的低碳供应链博弈与协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 66-76.Li Youdong, Xia Liangjie, Wang Fengzheng. Game and coordination model for low-carbon supply chain with product substitution[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(10): 66-76. [2] 夏良杰, 孔清逸, 李友东, 等. 考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 70-81.Xia Liangjie, Kong Qingyi, Li Youdong, et al. Emission reduction and pricing strategies of a low-carbon supply chain considering cross-shareholding[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 70-81. [3] Xia Liangjie, Guo Tingting, Qin Juanjuan, et al. Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 268: 149-175. [4] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116. [5] 李友东, 谢鑫鹏, 王锋正, 等. 考虑碳配额和交易的排放依赖型供应链低碳化运营决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(9): 2236-2244.Li Youdong, Xie Xinpeng, Wang Fengzheng, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain low-carbonization based behavior of enterprise operation decision under cap-and-trade environment[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(9): 2236-2244. [6] 夏良杰, 柳慧, 张萌, 等. 强制减排规制下基于碳减排利润增量分享契约的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 92-107.Xia Liangjie, Liu Hui, Zhang Meng, et al. Supply chain coordination based on incremental profit sharing contract of carbon emission reduction under mandatory carbon emissions capacity scheme[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5): 92-107. [7] 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 等. 碳限额交易政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(2): 134-145.Guo Junhua, Sun Linyang, Zhang Cheng, et al. Pricing and coordinating of supply chains considering the low-carbon preference of consumers under cap-and-trade mechanism[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(2): 134-145. [8] 杨磊, 张琴, 张智勇. 碳交易机制下供应链渠道选择与减排策略[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(11): 75-87.Yang Lei, Zhang Qin, Zhang Zhiyong. Channel selection and carbon emissions reduction policies in supply chains with the cap-and-trade scheme[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(11): 75-87. [9] 夏良杰, 白永万, 秦娟娟, 等. 碳交易规制下信息不对称供应链的减排和低碳推广博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 37-45.Xia Liangjie, Bai Yongwan, Qin Juanjuan, et al. Supply chain’s emission reduction and low carbon promotion policies in cap-and-trade system: The view of information asymmetry[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(6): 37-45. [10] 李新军, 陈美娜, 达庆利. 碳交易视角下政府管制的汽车制造企业闭环供应链优化决策[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(5): 269-279.Li Xinjun, Chen Meina, Da Qingli. Optimization decision of government-driving closed-loop supply chain for automobile manufacturers from the perspective of carbon trading[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(5): 269-279. [11] Ma Xin, Ho W, Ji Ping, et al. Contract design with information asymmetry in a supply chain under an emissions trading mechanism[J]. Decision Sciences, 2018, 49(1): 121-153. [12] Dong Ciwei, Shen Bin, Chow P S, et al. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 240: 509-531. [13] Cao Erbao, Yu Man. The bright side of carbon emission permits on supply chain financing and performance[J]. Omega, 2019, 88: 24-39. [14] Tang Ruihong, Yang Lei. Impacts of financing mechanism and power structure on supply chains under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 139: 101957. [15] Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 61-67. [16] 徐春秋, 赵道致,原白云, 等. 上下游联合减排与低碳宣传的微分博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(2): 53-65.Xu Chunqiu, Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun, et al. Differential game model on joint carbon emission reduction and low-carbon promotion in supply chains[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(2): 53-65. [17] 赵道致,原白云, 徐春秋. 低碳环境下供应链纵向减排合作的动态协调策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1): 147-154.Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun, Xu Chunqiu. Dynamic coordination strategy of vertical cooperative on carbon emission reduction in supply chain under low-carbon era[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016, 30(1): 147-154. [18] 刘名武, 万谧宇, 付红. 碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.Liu Mingwu, Wan Miyu, Fu Hong. Low-carbon technology for supply chain under cap and trade mechanism with low-carbon preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1): 152-162. [19] 徐春秋, 王芹鹏. 考虑政府参与方式的供应链低碳商誉微分博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 35-44.Xu Chunqiu, Wang Qinpeng. Differential game models of low carbon reputation considering government participation in supply chain[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(8): 35-44. [20] 叶同, 关志民, 陈大宇. 碳政策下考虑异质消费者的供应链动态优化[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(1): 14-22.Ye Tong, Guan Zhimin, Chen Dayu. Dynamic optimization of supply chain under carbon policy considering consumer heterogeneity[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2018, 23(1): 14-22. [21] Zhou Yanju, Ye Xin. Differential game model of joint emission reduction strategies and contract design in a dual-channel supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 592-607. [22] Xia Xiqiang, Ruan Junhu, Juan Zhiru, et al. Upstream-downstream joint carbon reduction strategies based on low-carbon promotion[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(7): 1351. [23] Zu Yafei, Chen Lianghua, Fan Yi. Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 177: 527-546. [24] Giovanni P D. Quality improvement vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer?[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 208(2): 119-130. [25] He Xiuli, Prasad A, Sethi S P. Cooperative advertising and pricing in a dynamic stochastic supply chain: Feedback Stackelberg strategies[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(1): 78-94. [26] Bryson A E, 何硫琦. 应用最优控制—最优化·估计·控制[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1982.Bryson A E,He Liuqi.Applied optimal control— optimization, estimation,and control[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,1982. [27] Sadegheih A. Optimal design methodologies under the carbon emission trading program using MIP, GA, SA, and TS[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15 (1), 504-513. [28] 赵黎明, 李聪, 郭祥. 基于微分博弈的政企救灾合作策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(4): 885-898.Zhao Liming, Li Cong, Guo Xiang. Research of cooperative relief strategy between government and enterprise based on differential game[J]. System Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2018, 38(4): 885-898. [29] Xia Xiqiang, Li Chengyu, Zhu Qinghua. Game analysis for the impact of carbon trading on low-carbon supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276:123220. |
[1] | 罗岭. 库存成本变化的VMI供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 187-197. |
[2] | 牟进进, 陈莒伟, 王淑云. 蓄冷式多温集配路径优化模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 236-246. |
[3] | 苏菊宁, 杨泽君, 王奕婷, 侯琳娜. 智联产品服务供应链研发运维多阶段联合优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 162-171. |
[4] | 蒙铭友, 邓世名, 徐和. 双渠道模式下定价与提前期联合优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 172-183. |
[5] | 葛显龙, 温鹏哲, 薛桂琴. 基于需求预测的两级动态配送路径优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 210-220. |
[6] | 朱江华, 张旭梅, 但斌, 刘墨林, 马崧萱. 不确定需求下考虑资金约束的生鲜农产品政府补贴策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 231-242. |
[7] | 熊峰, 魏瑶瑶, 王琼林, 李知远, 邵乐. 考虑成员风险规避的双渠道绿色供应链定价与绿色投入决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 267-276. |
[8] | 代建生, 刘悦. 公平偏好和销售努力下供应链期权契约协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 20-30. |
[9] | 和征, 张志钊, 杨小红. 云制造创新生态系统知识共享激励的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 77-87. |
[10] | 王兴棠. 绿色研发补贴、成本分担契约与收益共享契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 56-65. |
[11] | 杨浩雄, 顾子跃, 王浩, 赵川. 考虑跨渠道退货的双渠道供应链最优策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 116-126. |
[12] | 刘德文, 高维和, 闵凉宇. 可读性和吸引性对商品销量的影响——基于电影简介的文本分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 167-177. |
[13] | 文悦, , 王勇. 双渠道制造商成本信息不对称下电商平台最优服务契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 248-262. |
[14] | 吉清凯, 方刚, 赵达. 有限产能直销优先策略下双渠道供应链的定价博弈模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 184-193. |
[15] | 韩同银, 刘丽, 金浩. 考虑政府补贴和公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 194-204. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|