可加效用下基于消费者惰性的易逝品动态定价

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1060

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 99-105.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1060

• 论文 • 上一篇

可加效用下基于消费者惰性的易逝品动态定价

胡玉生¹, 李金林², 张文思³, 赵天¹

1.北京信息科技大学信息管理学院，北京100192；2.北京理工大学管理与经济学院，北京100081；3.中国海洋大学经济学院海洋发展研究院，山东青岛266100

收稿日期:2019-07-20 修回日期:2019-11-26 发布日期:2022-06-24
通讯作者: 胡玉生(1981-)，男(汉族)，安徽蚌埠人，北京信息科技大学信息管理学院，讲师，博士，研究方向：收益管理，Email：huyusheng1981@163.com. E-mail:huyusheng1981@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(91746210，71432002，71672011，71972012)；北京市社会科学基金资助项目(19YJB015，20JJC023)；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(20YJC630056)；北京信息科技大学“勤信人才”培育计划资助项目(QXTCP C202116)；北京市教育委员会科技计划一般项目(KM202111232017)

Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Product Based on Consumer Inertia under Additive Utility

HU Yu-sheng¹, LI Jin-lin², ZHANG Wen-si³, ZHAO Tian¹

1. School of Information Management, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China; 2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; 3. School of Economics, Marine Development Studies Institute, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

Received:2019-07-20 Revised:2019-11-26 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: 胡玉生 E-mail:huyusheng1981@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文在考虑销售商的风险规避态度和消费者惰性的情况下，研究了易逝品的动态定价策略。首先给出风险规避的销售商实施动态定价的马尔可夫决策过程，并运用MNL随机效用模型来刻画惰性消费者的购买决策，在此基础上，以风险规避销售商的期望效用最大化为目标，利用动态规划方法建立了可加效用下的易逝品动态定价模型，并探讨了消费者的惰性行为和销售商的风险规避态度对最优价格的影响。结论表明：在销售商的风险态度为风险规避的情况下，考虑消费者惰性行为的最优价格随库存水平的增加而降低，随剩余销售时间的增加而提高，消费者的惰性行为和销售商的风险规避态度对最优价格都存在负向影响，即最优价格随惰性深度的增加而降低，随惰性宽度的增加而降低，同时，销售商的风险规避态度越强烈，其制定的产品价格越低。

关键词: 惰性行为；动态定价；风险规避；易逝品

Abstract: The dynamic pricing strategy of perishable product is studied considering seller’s risk aversion and consumer inertia. Firstly, a Markov decision process is given for characterizing dynamic pricing strategy of risk-averse seller, and MNL random utility model is used to characterize the purchase decision of inertial consumer. On this basis, the dynamic pricing model of perishable product under the additive effect is established to maximize the risk-averse seller’s expected utility by dynamic programming method, and the influence of consumer inertia and seller’s risk aversion on the optimal price is discussed. The conclusions show that the optimal price decreases with the increase of inventory level, but increases with the increase of remaining sales time in the context of seller’s risk aversion and consumer inertia, and seller’s risk aversion and consumer inertia have both negative impact on the optimal price, in other words, the optimal price decreases with the increase of the inertia depth and inertia breadth, and the stronger seller’s risk aversion, the lower optimal price.

Key words: inertia behavior; dynamic pricing; risk aversion; perishable product

中图分类号:

F272.3

胡玉生, 李金林, 张文思, 赵天. 可加效用下基于消费者惰性的易逝品动态定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 99-105.

HU Yu-sheng, LI Jin-lin, ZHANG Wen-si, ZHAO Tian. Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Product Based on Consumer Inertia under Additive Utility[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 99-105.

参考文献

［1］黄松, 邱杰. 考虑顾客惰性时的供应链定价与存货决策研究［J］. 价值工程, 2014, 33(20): 22-25.Huang Song, Qiu Jie. Supply chain pricing and stocking decisions when considering customer inertia［J］. Value Engineering, 2014, 33(20): 22-25.
［2］ Mzoughi N, Garrouch K, Bouhlel O, et al. Online procrastination: A predictive model［J］. Journal of Internet Business, 2007, 4: 1-36.
［3］ Amir O, Ariely D. The pain of deciding: Indecision, procrastination, and consumer choice online［R］. Working Paper, Yale University, 2005.
［4］ Su Xuanming. A model of consumer inertia with applications to dynamic pricing［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(4): 365-380.
［5］ Agnew J, Balduzzi P, Sunden A. Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan［J］. American Economic Review, 2003, 93(1): 193-215.
［6］ Kempf A, Ruenzi S. Status quo bias and the number of alternatives: An empirical illustration from the mutual fund industry［J］. The journal of behavioral finance, 2006, 7(4): 204-213.
［7］赵藜. 考虑消费者有限理性行为的动态定价研究［D］. 上海：上海交通大学，2012.Zhao Li. A study on dynamic pricing considering consumers’ bounded rational behavior［D］.Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2012.
［8］ Dong Junfeng, Wu Desheng Dash. Two-period pricing and quick response with strategic customers［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 215: 165-173.
［9］ Kuang Yunjuan, Ng C T. Pricing substitutable products under consumer regrets［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 203: 286-300.
［10］谭美容. 短视和策略乘客并存的航空机票定价研究［J］. 工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(3): 107-115.Tan Meirong. Optimal pricing for tickets with myopic and strategic passengers［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2018, 23(3): 107-115.
［11］张川, 肖敏, 黄帅, 等. 考虑顾客策略行为的易逝品体验式营销最优定价［J］. 系统管理学报, 2018, 27(4): 783-790.Zhang Chuan, Xiao Min, Huang Shuai, et al. Optimal pricing of perishable goods in experiential marketing considering customer strategic behavior［J］. Journal of Systems & Management, 2018, 27(4): 783-790.
［12］唐跃武,范体军,刘莎.考虑策略性消费者的生鲜农产品定价和库存决策［J］.中国管理科学,2018,26(11): 105-113.Tang Yuewu, Fan Tijun, Liu Sha. Pricing and inventory decision-making for fresh agricultural products with strategic customers［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,26(11): 105-113.
［13］ Chen Yiwei, Farias V F. Robust dynamic pricing with strategic customers［J］. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2018, 43(4): 1119-1142.
［14］ Liu Jingchen, Zhai Xin, Chen Lihua. Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers［J］. Omega, 2019, 84: 1-17.
［15］ Rabin M. Psychology and economics ［J］. Journal of Economics Literature, 1998, 50(5): 11-46.
［16］ Teck H, Noah L, Colin F. Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics［J］. Journal of Market Research, 2006, 43(8): 307-331.
［17］ Zhao Li, Tian Peng, Li Xiangyong. Dynamic pricing in the presence of consumer inertia［J］. Omega, 2012, 40(2): 137-148.
［18］胡玉生,李金林,冉伦,等.基于乘客惰性行为的平行航班动态定价［J］. 运筹与管理,2018,27(4):112-117.Hu Yusheng, Li Jinlin, Ran Lun, et al. Dynamic pricing of parallel flights basedon passenger inertia behavior［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(4): 112-117.
［19］ Monahan G E, Petruzzin N C, Zhao Wen. The dynamic pricing problem from a newsvendor s perspective［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2004, 6 (1)：73-91.
［20］ Chen Youhua, Xu Minghui, Zhang Zhe George. A risk-averse newsvendor model under the CVaR criterion［J］. Operations research, 2009, 57(4): 1040-1044.
［21］ Schlosser R. A stochastic dynamic pricing and advertising model under risk aversion［J］. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 2015, 14(6): 451-468.
［22］王道平, 谷春晓, 张博卿. 风险规避和信息不对称下双渠道供应链的定价决策研究［J］. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(4): 20-25.Wang Daoping, Gu Chunxiao, Zhang Boqing. Pricing decision in dual-channel supply chain under risk-aversion and asymmetric information［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2016, 21(4): 20-25.
［23］ Gallego G, van Ryzin G. Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons［J］. Management Science, 1994, 40: 999-1020.
［24］ Barz C. Risk-averse capacity control in revenue management ［M］. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
［25］胡奇英, 刘建庸. 马尔可夫决策过程引论［M］. 西安：西安电子科技大学出版社, 2000.Hu Qiying, Liu Jianyong. A introduction to markov decision processes［M］. Xi’an: Xidian University Press, 2000.

[1]	王宇, 翟佳, 邓杰. 股权融资下企业市场竞争策略选择的模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 98-108.
[2]	王璐, 马庆庆, 杨劼, 郑君君. 基于复杂网络演化博弈的绿色消费者对新能源汽车扩散的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 74-85.
[3]	林莉, 王玉, 吴嘉聪. 消费者视角下中小企业社群动态定制仿真建模及其管理策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 13-29.
[4]	余顺坤, 闫泓序, 杜思悦, 林依青. 基于SC-RS的我国工业电力用户价值画像模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 106-116.
[5]	卢超, 王倩倩, 赵梦园, 闫俊琳. “双积分”政策下汽车制造商竞争定价与减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 64-76.
[6]	曲薪池, 侯贵生, 孙向彦. 消费者异质偏好结构下动态创新竞合系统定价与创新策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 88-99.
[7]	曹裕, 易超群, 万光羽. 碳税政策下随机双渠道库存与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 111-123.
[8]	牛攀峰，侯文华. 考虑供应商产品交付水平的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 70-83.
[9]	闫泓序，余顺坤，林依青. 我国工业电力用户价值画像模型构建与应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 224-235.
[10]	谈丹, 魏航, 李佩. 制造商技术开放策略问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 84-95.
[11]	樊相宇, 胡博雅, 武小平. 考虑无缺陷退货下零售商转运的供应链回购契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 139-147.
[12]	郎骁, 邵晓峰. 消费者导向类型与电商全渠道决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 164-175.
[13]	陈中洁, 于辉. 需求扰动下供应链反向保理的鲁棒决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 89-101.
[14]	黄毅祥, 蒲勇健, 熊艾伦, 史乐峰. 考虑消费者预期的电动汽车分时租赁市场价格竞争模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 212-220.
[15]	李鑫, 于辉. 零售商运营视角下投贷联动最优投资结构模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 73-85.

可加效用下基于消费者惰性的易逝品动态定价

Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Product Based on Consumer Inertia under Additive Utility

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0