消费者展厅行为和参考质量效应对O2O供应链动态运营策略的影响

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0649

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文研究消费者展厅行为和参考质量效应对O2O供应链动态运营策略的影响问题。分析了集中决策、分散决策和制造商分担实体店服务成本决策3种模式下的制造商产品质量策略、实体店和电商平台的服务竞争策略，以及品牌商誉变化和企业利润等问题。并进行了价格、实体店访问比例和展厅行为强度对企业绩效的影响。研究发现：展厅行为会挫伤实体店提供服务的积极性，降低品牌商誉，从而损害制造商和实体店的利润水平；而消费者的这种搭便车行为会提高电商平台利润，但由于参考质量效应的存在，其提升空间有限。综合而言，展厅行为对供应链总体绩效不利。应对展厅行为的长期战略有：1)加强上下游的纵向合作，制造商分担实体店服务成本契约，能实现供应链总体绩效的帕累托改进。2)从受展厅行为影响最大的实体店角度，保持线下产品高定价、高服务水平，提升消费者支付意愿，全面提升实体店的品牌溢价能力，获取长久生存之道。

关键词: 展厅行为；O2O供应链；参考质量效应；微分博弈；搭便车行为；品牌溢价

Abstract: Omni-channel retailing enriches consumers’ shopping choices. Consumers can find the best choice for their purchase by distinguishing the distinctive characteristics of each sales channel. But this has also caused consumers’ showrooming behavior- they conduct product experience in the brick and mortar store to determine the suitable product for their own, and then to buy the products online in e-commerce platform which has lower price. This kind of free-riding behavior of consumers often brings huge damage to the brick and mortar store and even the supply chain, which also triggers the research on the showrooming behavior and the discussion on the web-showrooming both in business community and academic circles.

Key words: showrooming；O2O supply chain；reference quality effect；differential game；free-riding behavior；brand premium

中图分类号:

F224

马德青, 胡劲松. 消费者展厅行为和参考质量效应对O2O供应链动态运营策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 167-183.

MA De-qing, HU Jin-song. Study on the Dynamic Operation and Marketing Strategies of O2O Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Showrooming and Reference Quality Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(4): 167-183.

参考文献

［1］ Rigby D. The future of shopping［J］.Havard Business Review,2011,89(12).
［2］ Gao Fei, Su Xuanming. Online and offline Information for omnichannel retailing［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2016:1-15.
［3］ Mehra A, Kumar S, Raju J S. Competitive strategies for Brick-and-mortar stores to counter ‘Showrooming’［J］. Management Science,2017, 64(7): 3076-3090.
［4］ Zimmerman A. Can retailers halt ‘showrooming’? ［J］. Wall Street Journal,2012.
［5］ Basu P, Basak S, Avittathur B, et al. A game theoretic analysis of multichannel retail in the context of “showrooming” ［J］. Decision Support Systems, 2017:S0167923617301574.
［6］ Jing Bing. Showrooming and webrooming: Information externalities between online and offline sellers［J］. Marketing Science, 2018,37(3):469-483.
［7］ Balakrishnan A, Sundaresan S， Zhang B. Browse-and-switch: Retail-online competition under value uncertainty［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(7):1129-1145.
［8］ Jing Bing. Lowering customer evaluation costs, product differentiation, and price competition［J］. Marketing Science, 2016,35(1):113-127.
［9］ Bell D R, Gallino S, Moreno A. Offline showrooms in omni-channel retail: Demand and operational benefits［J］. Management Science,2017:1-23.
［10］ Gensler S, Neslin S A, Verhoef P C. The showrooming phenomenon: It’s more than just about price［J］. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2017, 38(1):29-43.
［11］ Liu Pan, Yi Shuping. Pricing policies of green supply chain considering targeted advertising and product green degree in the Big Data environment［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164:1614-1622.
［12］ Kuksov D, Liao C. When showrooming increases retailer profit［J］. Journal of Marketing Research, 2018:jmr.17.0059.
［13］ Adele Sweetwood. The analytical marketer: how to transform your marketing organization［M］. Harvard Business Review Press,2016.
［14］ Chiang W Y K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design［J］. Management Science, 2003, 49(1):1-20.
［15］ Chenavaz R. Dynamic quality policies with reference quality effects［J］. Applied Economics, 2018, 49:1-7.
［16］ Liu G, Sethi S P, Zhang J. Myopic vs. far-sighted behaviours in a revenue-sharing supply chain with reference quality effects［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(5):1-24.
［17］ Gavious A, Lowengart O. Price-quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects［J］. Marketing Letters, 2012, 23(1):137-161.
［18］马德青，胡劲松. 大数据营销与参考价格效应下的闭环供应链协同经营策略研究［J］. 软科学，2019，33(11): 98-106.Ma Deqing, Hu Jinsong. Research on cooperative operation mode of closed-loop supply chain under big-data marketing and reference price effect［J］. Soft Science,2019, 33(11): 98-106.
［19］ Gallino S, Moreno A. Integration of online and offline channels in retail: The impact of sharing reliable inventory availability information［M］. INFORMS, 2014.
［20］金亮, 张旭梅, 但斌, 等. 交叉销售下“线下体验+线上零售”的O2O供应链佣金契约设计［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(11):33-46.Jin Liang, Zhang Xumei, Dan Bin, et al. Commission contract designin“Offline evaluation. Online purchase”(O2O) supply chain in the presence of cross-selling［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2017,25(11):33-46.
［21］范丹丹, 徐琪, 王文杰. 考虑线上线下需求迁移下的供应链O2O最优服务决策研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(11):22-24.Fan Dandan, Xu Qi, Wang Wenjie. Optimal service decisions consideration demand shift between online and offline in supply chain O2O system［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2017,25(11):22-24.
［22］姜力文,戢守峰,孙琦,等. 考虑品牌APP丰富度的O2O供应链渠道选择与定价策略［J］. 管理工程学报, 2018, 32(3):182-191.Jiang Liwen, Ji Shoufeng, Sun Qi, et al.Research on channel selection and pricing strategies by considering brand APP pichness in O2O supply chain［J］.Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2018,32(3):182-191.
［23］ He Yanyan, Zhang Juan, Gou Qinglong, et al. Supply chain decisions with reference quality effect under the O2O environment［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 268(1):1-20.
［24］马德青，胡劲松. 模式下考虑消费者参考效应和成员互惠利他的产品—服务供应链微分博弈［J］.管理工程学报,2021,35(1):151-167.Ma Deqing, Hu Jinsong.Differential game of product-service supply chain considering consumers’ reference effect and members’ reciprocity altruism under O2O mode［J］.Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2021,35(1):151-167.
［25］马歇尔·费舍,桑提亚哥·加利诺，谢尔盖·奈特西. 被零售商浪费的利器［J］. 哈佛商业评论, 2019,2:88-95.Marshall Fischer, Santiago Galino, Sergei Netsi. The sharpshooter wasted by retailers［J］. Harvard Business Review, 2019,2:88-95.
［26］ Nerlove M, Arrow K J. Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions［J］. Economica, 1962, 29(114):129-142.
［27］ Caulkins J P, Feichtinger G, Grass D, et al. Interaction of pricing, advertising and experience quality: A dynamic analysis［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 256(3):877-885.
［28］ Engwerda. LQ dynamic optimization and differential games［M］. New York: Springer US, 2010.

[1]	李峰, 朱平, 梁樑, 寇纲. 基于最近距离投影的DEA两阶段效率评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 198-209.
[2]	陈俊霖, 王山. 双渠道供应链中紧俏产品升级成本分担演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 224-235.
[3]	李芮萌, 杨乃定, 刘慧, 张延禄. 考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 265-276.
[4]	王健, 李明操, 郭文轩, 蒋忠中. 个股情绪、定向增发与大股东利益输送——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 23-35.
[5]	孟华强, 索玮岚. 考虑风险关联和决策者偏好的海外投资国家风险评估研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 61-70.
[6]	陈金晓, 陈剑. 供应链的利润博弈与均衡定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 128-139.
[7]	李文莉, 李昆鹏, 田倩南, 李雪松. 突发疫情环境下考虑订单释放时间的零售物流配送路径优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 195-205.
[8]	单汩源, 王建江, 别黎. 基于自适应大邻域搜索的鲁棒多项目调度方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 217-231.
[9]	吴金宴, 王鹏. 哪些因素影响了股市风险传染？——来自行业数据的证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 57-68.
[10]	刘婉君, 张静文, 刘万琳. 基于拍卖机制的资源转移时间型动态分布式多项目调度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 117-129.
[11]	杜黎, 霍煜杰, 宋金美. 公开或隐藏未来市场价格对新品预售的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 221-230.
[12]	时奇, 沈芳. 债券投标专利拍卖：均衡策略与期望收益[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 22-33.
[13]	贺勇, 陈志豪, 廖诺. 政府补贴方式对绿色供应链制造商减排决策的影响机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 87-98.
[14]	张俊光, 李婧. 基于工序异质性的关键链项目缓冲监控[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 106-115.
[15]	王树斌, 卢全莹, 柴建. 基于GMDH-RSM方法的非常规油气生产技术多指标组合对产能的影响效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 275-286.