信息不对称对闭环供应链MTO和MTS模式的影响研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.05.016

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 139-148.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.05.016

信息不对称对闭环供应链MTO和MTS模式的影响研究

肖群^1,2, 马士华²

1. 云南财经大学商学院, 云南昆明 650221;
2. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2014-10-29 修回日期:2015-07-22 出版日期:2016-05-20 发布日期:2016-05-24
通讯作者: 肖群(1979-),女(纳西族),四川内江人,云南财经大学商学院讲师,华中科技大学管理学院博士生,研究方向:物流与供应链管理,E-mail:xiaoqun182@sina.com. E-mail:xiaoqun182@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472069)

The Research on the Effect of Asymmetric Information on MTO and MTS in Closed-loop Supply Chain

XIAO Qun^1,2, MA Shi-hua²

1. Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China;
2. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2014-10-29 Revised:2015-07-22 Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-05-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在MTO(按订单生产)和MTS(按库存生产)两种模式下,比对了信息不对称和信息共享下产品定价、废旧品回收率和零售商利润的区别,研究结果显示:(1) 产品定价、废旧品回收率和零售商利润不受生产模式改变的影响;(2) 在某些条件下,信息共享下产品的批发价、零售价、和废旧品回收率均高于信息不对称时的相应值,进行信息共享会增加闭环供应链的总体利润,但零售商有可能通过信息共享丧失信息优势,从而使得其利润受损。因此为了促使零售商参与信息共享,信息共享参与方应投资建立安全的通信系统,以保证共享信息不被泄露。另外本文通过引入纳什讨价还价模型建立了一个公平的利润划拨机制,该机制使得最后的利润划分只取决于各参与方的议价能力,与各参与方对通信系统投资大小无关。

关键词: 按订单生产模式, 按库存生产模式, 信息不对称, 信息共享

Abstract: A decentralized distribution closed-loop channel is considered.The manufacturer is the stackelberg leader of the channel, who has incorporated a remanufacturing process for used products into her original production system, so that she can manufacture a new product directly from raw materials, or remanufacture part or whole of a returned unit into a new product.Facing random demand of a single product with a short life cycle, a setting where the retailer has accurate demand information while the manufacturer does not is considered.Under the asymmetric and complete information condition, the product pricing, the recovery rate and the retailer's profit in make-to-order scenario and make-to-stock scenario respectively are compared.It is found that:(1) the product pricing, the recovery rate and the retailer's profit are not affected by the change of the production mode; (2) In some conditions, information sharing would increase the whole supply chain profit, but the retailer would lose the information superiority so that his profit would decrease.In order to attract the retailer to share his private information, the manufacturer and the retailer can invest to establish a security communication system jointly to assure to reach the demand information won't be revealed.Then the whole revenue of the closed-loop supply chain will be more than that in asymmetric information.For ensuring an information sharing equilibrium and an fairly revenue allocation, a nash bargain model is proposed, in which the manufacturer and the retailer not only get back the communicaiton investment cost, but also get more profit decided by their bargain power respectively and is independent of the amount of the communication system investment.

Key words: make-to-order, make-to-stock, asymmetric information, information sharing

中图分类号:

F224

肖群, 马士华. 信息不对称对闭环供应链MTO和MTS模式的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 139-148.

XIAO Qun, MA Shi-hua. The Research on the Effect of Asymmetric Information on MTO and MTS in Closed-loop Supply Chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(5): 139-148.

参考文献

[1] Bayindir Z P, N Erkip, R Güllü.Assessing the benefits of remanufac-turing option under one-way substitution and capacity constraint[J].Computers& OperationsResearch, 2007, (34):487-514.

[2] 王玉燕.基于产品生命周期理论的直销型闭环供应链的广告策略与定价策略[J].系统管理学报,2014,23(3):388-396.

[3] Fleischmann M, Bloemhof Ruwaard J M,Dekker R, et al.Quantitative models for reverse logistics:A review[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 103(1):1-17.

[4] 张克勇,候世旺,周国华.公平关切下闭环供应链定价策略[J].系统管理学报,2013,22(6):841-849.

[5] Hsieh C C, Wu Chenghan, Huang Yajing.Ordering and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain with asymmetric demand information[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 190(2):509-525.

[6] Cai Gangshu, Zhang Z G, Zhang M. Game theoretical perspectives on dual-channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2009,117(1):80-96.

[7] Mukhopadhyay S K, Yue Xiaohang, Zhu Xiaowei. A Stackelberg model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(2):424-433.

[8] Yan Ruiliang, Pei Zhi. Information asymmetry, pricing strategy and firm's performance in the retailer-multi-channel manufacturer supply chain[J].Journal of Business Research, 64(2):377-384.

[9] Raju J, Roy A. Market information and firm performance[J].Management Science, 2000, 46(8):1075-1084

[10] 艾兴政,唐小我,马永开.传统渠道与电子渠道预测信息分享的绩效研究[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(1):12-21.

[11] 熊中楷,张洪艳.不对称信息下闭环供应链的定价策略[J].工业工程,2009,12(3):39-42.

[12] Zhang Pan,Xiong Yu,Xiong Zhongkai, et al.Designing contracts for a closed-loop supply chain under information asymmetry[J].2014,42(2):150-155.

[13] Yue Xiaohang, Liu J.Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006, 174(1):646-667.

[14] 聂佳佳.需求信息预测对制造商回收再制造策略的价值[J].管理科学学报, 2014, 17(1):35-47.

[15] Winkler R L.Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources[J].Management Science, 1981, 27(4):479-488.

[16] Lee H L, So K C.Tang, The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain.Management Science[J].2000, 46(5):626-643.

[17] Bagchi P K,Skjoett-Larsen T.Supply Chain integration:A European survey[J].International Journal of Logistics Management, 2005, 16(2):275-294.

[18] Viswanathan S,Widiarta H,Piplani R. Value of information exchange and synchronizaion in a multi-tier supply chain[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(21):5057-5074.

[19] Stadtler H.A framework for collaborative planning and state-off-the-art[J].Operation Research Spectrum 2009, 31(1):5-30.

[20] Atallah M J, Elmongui H G,Deshpande V,et al. Secure supply-chain protocols[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Internation Conference on E-Commerce,Newport Beach,CA,USA,June 24-27,2003.

[21] 鲁芳, 仲伟俊, 张玉林. 成本信息保护下的安全供应链联合订货决策[J]. 管理工程学报,2009,23(4):163-165.

[22] 董绍辉, 西宝, 田丽娜. 基于安全多方计算的供应链产能分配机制[J]. 华东经济管理, 2009, 23(5):82-84.

[23] 谢翠华, 仲伟俊, 张玉林. 私有信息保护的多零售商联合订货研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2009, 288(12):47-50.

[24] 谢翠华, 仲伟俊, 张玉林. 私有信息保护的多产品联合订货研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2009, 294(18):50-53.

[25] Clifton C. Anapporach to securely identifying beneficial collaboration in decentralized logistics systems[J].Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(1):108-125.

[26] Pibernil R, Zhang Yingying.Secure collaborative supply chain planning and inverse optimization-The JELS model[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2011,208(1):75-85.

信息不对称对闭环供应链MTO和MTS模式的影响研究

The Research on the Effect of Asymmetric Information on MTO and MTS in Closed-loop Supply Chain

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	郭鑫鑫, 王海燕, 许蒙蒙. 医疗信息共享对患者转移数量和服务质量水平影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 226-236.
[2]	林志炳. 基于网络外部性的绿色制造策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 137-145.
[3]	马本江, 尹鹏华, 陈晓红, 徐赛雪. 逆向选择条件下带奖惩金的两期保险契约模型及其Pareto改进性研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 30-41.
[4]	王文隆, 王成军. 基于竞争型制造商创新投入的零售商需求预测信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 127-138.
[5]	赵志明, 王姚, 舒建平. 信息不对称下逆周期缓冲资本对银行投融资的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 13-23.
[6]	金亮, 吴应甲, 赵新杰. 消费者退货对在线零售商促销与合同设计的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 123-136.
[7]	张盼, 余莉婷, 熊中楷. 政府奖惩下闭环供应链中信息不对称时的最优合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 89-100.
[8]	张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 韩广华, 王磊. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 112-121.
[9]	吴江华, 姜帆. 供应链中具有产能限制的竞争企业中的信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 146-158.
[10]	冯华, 聂蕾, 施雨玲. 供应链治理机制与供应链绩效之间的相互作用关系——基于信息共享的中介效应和信息技术水平的调节效应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 104-114.
[11]	成燕, 梅姝娥, 仲伟俊. 用户隐私风险感知对平台社交账号登录方式选择的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 196-207.
[12]	周茂森, 张庆宇. 双向部分透明供应链的大数据投资决策与激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 130-144.
[13]	周建亨, 冉芸. 基于策略性竞争博弈的供应链信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 88-102.
[14]	士明军, 王勇, 但斌, 文悦. 绿色供应链中不对称需求预测下的信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 104-114.
[15]	许明辉, 杨东升. 制造商成本削减策略对风险规避型零售商信息共享策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 77-87.