考虑交易成本的投资组合效率估计方法

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.01.004

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 25-33.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.01.004

考虑交易成本的投资组合效率估计方法

周忠宝¹, 丁慧¹, 马超群¹, 王梅¹, 刘文斌^1,2

1. 湖南大学工商管理学院, 湖南长沙 410082;
2. Business School, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7PE

收稿日期:2013-01-26 修回日期:2013-07-03 出版日期:2015-01-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:周忠宝(1977-),男(汉族),山东齐河人,湖南大学工商管理学院副教授,博士生导师,研究方向:金融工程与风险管理、系统优化与决策.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371067,71431008)

Technical Efficiency Evaluation Approach for Portfolios with Transaction Costs

ZHOU Zhong-bao¹, DING Hui¹, MA Chao-qun¹, WANG Mei¹, LIU Wen-bin^1,2

1. School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;
2. Business School, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7PE, England

Received:2013-01-26 Revised:2013-07-03 Online:2015-01-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 投资组合绩效评价是学术界研究的热点问题。本文在经典的经济学框架下,基于真实前沿面,给出了投资组合效率的明确定义。由于实际投资环境的影响,投资组合优化模型非常复杂,难以获得真实前沿面的解析解,这给投资组合效率的应用带来了很大的困难。本文基于投资组合理论,在投资组合模型所对应的前沿面为凹函数的情况下,采用基于数据的投资组合DEA评价模型构造前沿面来逼近真实的前沿面,从而估计一般情形下投资组合的效率。在此基础上研究了考虑交易成本的投资组合效率评价问题,并用实例说明了本文方法的合理性与可行性。

关键词: 投资组合效率, 有效前沿面, 数据包络分析, 交易成本

Abstract: Portfolio performance is an academic hotspot for researchers. Within the classical framework of economics, the definition of portfolio efficiency is provided based on the efficient frontier. However, in practical situations, the portfolio optimization models are usually very complicated, and thus the analytical solutions of frontier are very difficult to obtain. Under the assumption that the real efficient frontier is a concave function, DEA model is adopted to approximate the real frontier and portfolio efficiencies. The problem of evaluating the portfolio efficiency on considering transaction costs is examined. In the end, some examples are presented to show the practicality and feasibility of the proposed approach.

Key words: portfolio efficiency, efficient frontier, data envelopment analysis, transaction costs

中图分类号:

F830.59

周忠宝, 丁慧, 马超群, 王梅, 刘文斌. 考虑交易成本的投资组合效率估计方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 25-33.

ZHOU Zhong-bao, DING Hui, MA Chao-qun, WANG Mei, LIU Wen-bin. Technical Efficiency Evaluation Approach for Portfolios with Transaction Costs[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(1): 25-33.

参考文献

[1] Markowitz H.Portfolio selection [J]. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1): 77-91.

[2] Joro T, Na P. Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean-variance-skewness framework[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175(1): 446-461.

[3] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring efficiency of decision making units [J]. European of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.

[4] BankerR D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis [J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078-1092.

[5] Lobo M S, Fazel M, Boyd S. Portfolio optimization with linear and fixed transaction costs [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2007, 152(1): 341-365.

[6] Angelelli E, Mansini R, Speranza M G. A comparison of MAD and CVaR models with real features [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008, 32(7): 1188-1197.

[7] Bertsimas D,Pachamanova D. Robust multiperiod portfolio management in the presence of transaction costs [J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2008, 35(1): 3-17.

[8] Ben-Tal A,Margalit T, Nemirovski A. Robust modeling of multi-stage portfolio problems [M]//Frenk H, Roos K, Terlaky T, et al. High-performance optimization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.

[9] Yu J R, Lee W Y. Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 209(2): 166-175.

[10] Best M J, Hlouskova J. An algorithm for portfolio optimization with variable transaction costs, part 1: theory [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2007, 135(3): 563-581.

[11] Best M J, Hlouskova J. An algorithm for portfolio optimization with variable transaction costs, part 2: computational analysis [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2007, 135(3): 531-547.

[12] Le Thi H A, Moeini M, Dinh T P. DC programming approach for portfolio optimization under step increasing transaction costs [J]. Optimization, 2009, 58(3): 267-289.

[13] Konno H,Akishino K, Yamamoto R. Optimization of a long-short portfolio under nonconvex transaction cost [J]. Computational Optimization and Applications, 2005, 32(1-2): 115-132.

[14] Konno H,Wijayanayake A. Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model under transaction costs [J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 1999, 42(4): 422-435.

[15] Konno H,Wijayanayake A. Portfolio optimization problem under concave transaction costs and minimal transaction unit constraints [J]. Mathematical Programming Series B, 2001, 89(2): 233-250.

[16] Konno H,Wijayanayake A. Portfolio optimization under D.C. transaction costs and minimal transaction unit constraints [J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2002, 22(1-4): 137-154.

[17] Konno H, Yamamoto R. Minimal concave cost rebalance of a portfolio to the efficient frontier [J]. Mathematical Programming Series B, 2003, 97(3): 571-585.

[18] Konno H, Yamamoto R. Global optimization versus integer programming in portfolio optimization undernonconvex transaction costs[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2005, 32(2): 207-219.

[19] Farrell M J. The Measurement of Production Efficiency[J]. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 1957, 120(3): 253-281.

[20] Leibenstein H. Allocative effciency vs "X-efficiency"[J]. American Economic Review, 1966, 56(3): 392-415.

考虑交易成本的投资组合效率估计方法

Technical Efficiency Evaluation Approach for Portfolios with Transaction Costs

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王昱, 杨珊珊. 考虑多维效率的上市公司财务困境预警研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 32-41.
[2]	夏琼, 杨峰, 吴华清. “三重底线”下中国商业银行经营效率及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 26-36.
[3]	王恰. 额外资源按需分配方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 206-216.
[4]	金飞飞, 倪志伟, 陈华友, 朱旭辉, 武文颖. 基于一致性局部调整算法和DEA的语言偏好决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 152-163.
[5]	伊茹, 马占新. 只有输出的广义样本区间DEA模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 194-204.
[6]	王建建, 何枫, 吴子轩, 陈丽莉. 改进区间可接受度的证券投资组合区间二次规划模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 11-18.
[7]	谷晓燕, 何锋. 风险条件下研发项目改进DEA选择模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 47-54.
[8]	刘文丽, 王应明, 吕书龙. 基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 163-170.
[9]	杜涛, 冉伦, 李金林, 曹雪丽. 基于效率的组织多属性决策及实证研究：DEA-TOPSIS组合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 153-162.
[10]	成达建, 薛声家. 基于交叉效率新计算方法的区间效率值排序[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 191-196.
[11]	陶杰, 卢超. 整数DEA问题的求解方法与改进[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 151-160.
[12]	周忠宝, 金倩颖, 曾喜梅, 吴乾, 刘文斌. 存在基数约束的投资组合效率评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 174-179.
[13]	冯晨鹏, 王慧玲, 毕功兵. 存在多种非期望产出的非径向零和收益DEA模型我国区域环境效率实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(10): 42-51.
[14]	王崇, 吴价宝, 王延青. 移动电子商务下交易成本影响消费者感知价值的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 98-106.
[15]	王有森, 许皓, 卞亦文. 工业用水系统效率评价:考虑污染物可处理特性的两阶段DEA[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3): 169-176.